Tahniah kepada wanita yangs uka menjaga kesihatan anda sendiri . tapi jangan terlalu obses . You are what you eat . memang betul makan tambahan sangat penting terutama untuk awet muda . hehe .
kalau kita tengok zaman sekarang terlal ramai wanita terlalu obses . Itulah hakikat .
pertama : jamu atau produk pengetat faraj kononnya unuk kebahagiaan ruma tangga . cukuplah dengan pengambilan jamu bukan dengan cara memasukkan jamu ke dalam V .
kedua : vitamin / makanan tambahan yang tidak jelas . contohnya yang tidak selamat .
ketiga : toiletries (pencuci muka dll ) dan cosmetik..
ni saya seacrh dari google ::
Toxic cancer causing (carcinogenic) chemicals in the air we breathe, the
food we eat and the personal care toiletries we use on our hair, skin and in
our mouths may
be contributing to the spiralling rate of cancer and metabolic disease whilst
speeding up the aging process..setuju ? okay
"The glossy images
we're fed by the media hide a dangerous secret: Most of our
toiletries, even the "natural variety", are made from the same
harsh chemicals used for industry".
What could be more healthy than a
refreshing body wash, a nourishing shampoo, a minty fresh toothpaste and a
moisturizing facial cream? Commercials, magazine advertisements and
billboards bombard us with the message that soaping and scrubbing,
exfoliating and moisturizing are only beneficial to our health
Yet the glossy images
of well scrubbed individuals hide a dangerous secret:
Too many of the toiletries and cosmetics we
use are carcinogenic cocktails of hazardous waste. Most of the chemicals
which go into our toiletries are no different from the harsh toxic
chemicals used in industry. Far from enhancing health they pose a
daily threat to it. For example, propylene glycol (PG) is a wetting
agent and solvent used in make up, hair care products, deodorants
and after shave. Its also the main ingredient in antifreeze and
brake fluid. Similarly, polyethylene glycol (PEG), a related agent
found in most skin cleansers, is a caustic used to dissolve grease... the
same substance you find in oven cleaners. Isopropyl, an alcohol used
in hair rinses, hand lotions and fragrances, is also a solvent found in
shellac.
What to watch out for
When selecting kinder
cosmetics and toiletries, choose products which do not have
any of the following ingredients.
|
|
DEA (diethanolamine), TEA (Triethanolamine)
are almost always in products that foam: bubble bath, body washes,
shampoos, soaps and facial cleansers. They are used to thicken, wet,
alkalise and clean. While they are irritating to the skin, eyes and
respiratory tract (Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 1997; 149: 1-86) DEA, MEA
and TEA are not considered particularly toxic in themselves. However
once added to the product these chemicals readily react with any nitrites
present to form potentially carcinogenic nitrosamines, such as NDEA (N-nitrosodiethanolamine).
Of the three, MEA and DEA pose the greatest risk to human health.
Prolonged exposure to these can alter liver and kidney function (J
Am Coll Toxicol, 1983; 2: 183- 235) and even lead to cancer (Rev Environ
Contam Toxicol, 1997; 149: 1-86).
Nitrites get into personal care products
in several ways. They can be added as anticorrosive agents, they can be
released as a result of the degradation of other chemicals, specifically
2-nitro-1,3-propanediol (BNDP), or they can be present as contaminants in
raw materials. Ingredients such as formaldehyde or
formaldehyde-forming chemicals, or 2-bromo-2-nitropropane (also known as
Bronopol) which can break down into formaldehyde.... can also produce
nitrosamines.
The long shelf life of most toiletries
also increases the risk of creating a carcinogenic reaction.
Stored for a long time at elevated temperatures, nitrates will continue to
form in a product, accelerated by the presence of other chemicals, such as
formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde, thiocyanate, nitrophenols and certain
metal salts (Science, 1973; 182: 1245-6; J Nat
Cancer Inst, 1977; 58:409;Nature, 1977; 266: 657-8; Fd Cosmet Toxicol,
1983; 21: 607-14)
Inadequate and confusing labelling
means that consumers may never know which products are most likely to be
contaminated. However, in a recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
report, approximately 42% of all cosmetics were contaminated with NDEA,
with shampoos having the highest concentrations
(National Toxicology Program, Seventh Annual Report on Carcinogens,
Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994).
In Europe, where more safeguards are in
place regarding nitrosating agents, the picture is somewhat better.
For instance, in Germany, after the Federal Health Office issued a request
to eliminate all secondary amines (such as DEA) from cosmetics in 1987 a
report confirmed that only 15 per cent of products tested were
contaminated with NDEA (Eisenbrand,
G, et al in O'neill, IK, et al [Eds}; N-Nitrosoalknolamines in cosmetics,
Lyon: IARC, 1991).
Manufactures insist that DEA and its
relatives are "safe" in products designed for brief or
discontinuous use or those which wash off. However there is evidence
from both human and animal studies that NDEA can be quickly absorbed
through the skin (J Nat Cancer Inst, 1981; 66: 125-7; Toxicol Lett, 1979; 4: 217-22).
This argument also doesn't explain why
these chemicals crop up regularly in body lotions and facial moisturisers,
which are of course meant to stay on the skin for long periods of time.
As far back as 1978, the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that "Although no
epidemiological data were available, nitrosodiethanolamine should
be regarded for practical purposes, as if it were carcinogenic to
humans" (IRAC, 1978;
17: 77-82). This position was reaffirmed
nearly 10 years later.
DYEING or DYING?????
If you use
permanent or semi-permanent hair colours You are increasing your
risk of developing cancer.
Both animal and human studies show
that the body rapidly absorbs chemicals in permanent and
semi-permanent dyes through the skin during the more than 30 minutes
that dyes remain on the scalp.
In 1979, a US study found a significant relationship between frequency and duration of hair dye use and breast cancer (J Nat Cancer Inst, 1979; 62: 277-83). Those at greatest risk were 50 to 79 year olds, suggesting that cancer takes years to develop. |
Women who started dyeing their hair at
age 20 had twice the risk of those who'd started at 40.
Another study found women who dye their hair to
change its colour, rather than masking greyness, were at a threefold
risk (J Nat Cancer Inst, 1980; 64: 64: 23-8). More recently, a jointly funded American Cancer Society and FDA study admitted a fourfold increase in relatively uncommon cancers, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma in hair-dye users (J Nat Cancer Inst, 1994; 215-310).
The darker the
shades of permanent and semi-permanent
dyes, the higher the risks of
breast cancer; women who use black, dark brown or red dyes are at
the greatest risk!
|
itulah sangat penting untuk kita memilih produk terbaik bukan asal murah je . kalau senang kita nak tengok macam tupperware la dibandingkan dengan bekas makanan lain . korang faham kan ? itulah kualiti namanya .
In America in 1994, the National Toxicology Program similarly concluded in
its Seventh Annual Report on Carcinogens that: "There is sufficient
evidence for the carcinogenicity of N-nitrodiethanolamine in experimental
animals." The report noted that of more than 44 different species in
which NDEA compounds have been tested all have been susceptible (Lijinsky,
W, Chemistry and Biology of N-Nitroso Comaounds, New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1992).
Humans were unlikely to be
the single exception said the paper.
he cosmetics industry's response to the problems of nitrosamine formation
has been to put even more chemicals in their products in an attempt to slow or
inhibit the formation of NDEA. These include ascorbic acid, sodium
bisulfite, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT),
sodium ascorbate, ascorbyl palmitate and a-tocopherol. None has proved
adequate to prevent nitrosamine formation (Cosmetics & Toiletries,
1994; 109: 53)
In 1996, the Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrance Association
(Cosmetic
Ingredient Review, Washington DC; 1996 CIR Compendium) stated:
"These chemicals [Cocamide DEA, Lauramide DEA, Linoleamide DEA,
and Oleamide DEA] should not be used as ingredients in cosmetic products
containing nitrosating agents."
sekian nota dari cik doter . nota inggeris ini di copy dari google .
Assalamualaikum fida, kawan sheila pun ada jual pil yang masuk kat faraj pastu keluar benda2 putih dengan darah berketul. terasa gak nak cuba tapi takut sangat. nasib baik baca entri fida ni. thanks dear!
ReplyDeletewaalaikummussalam sheila . sebenarnya fida jumpa artikel tu dalam majalah wanita .. so search la sikit.. pasal jamu tu saya penah tengok dalam ni : https://www.facebook.com/DrZubaidiHjAhmad nanti saya tengok entry yg berkenaan . busy sikit nak belek post yg lama memakan masa .
DeleteAssalamualaikum fida, sheila ada tagging kamu dalam satu giveaway. jangan lupa jenguk ye :)
Deletehttp://sheilashahfiekry.blogspot.com/2013/01/giveaway-new-year-2013-jiwa-rosak.html
eeeii masukkn pil dlm v? omegot seramnye HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH!!!
ReplyDeletejenis ubat terbaru huhu ..kalau diberi pilihan tak sanggup nak buat untuk diri sendiri .
Deletetak payah nak ketat ketat sangatlah..berbahgialah dengan apa yg ada...poyo kan kak zu nih...
ReplyDeletehehe kite belum kawin lagi .. saja nak kongsikan sebab rasa seram sangatt..
Deletetakutlahhh bila baca T.T thanks for the sharing. really helps me a lot!
ReplyDeleteuuu seraamnyeee huhuhu... xnak la yg pelik2 huhuhu
ReplyDeleteIssskkkk..macam2 hal yek....
ReplyDeletesume ni happen kat wanita je ke? senang cite nak elak jadi bende2 macam ni.. bersyukur je r dengan ape yang ade kan..
ReplyDeletescary lak baca
ReplyDeletemenakutkan la, thanks sharing :)
ReplyDelete